Masters Of Architecture (2-Year)
The Masters in Architecture (2-Year) is a continuation of study following receipt of the BS of Design - Architecture and is an accredited program by the National Architectural Accreditation Board (NAAB). An application process is required for admittance to the program.
Courses
Click here to view the 6-year Architecture flow chart.
Fifth Year, First SemesterARCH 510 5 cr Arch Design I
ARCH 680 3 cr Professional Practice
ARCH 683 3 cr Programming
Elective 3 cr Professional Elective
Total 14 cr
Fifth Year, Second Semester
ARCH 511 5 cr Arch Design II
Elective 3 cr Professional Elective
Elective 3 cr Professional Elective
Elective 3 cr Professional Elective
Total 14 cr
Sixth Year, First Semester
(Thesis option)
ARCH 613 6 cr Arch Design Project I
Elective 3 cr Professional Elective
Elective 2 cr Professional Elective
Elective 3 cr OPEN Elective
Total 14 cr
(Studio Option)
Arch 610 5 cr Arch Design III
Elective 1 cr Professional Elective
Elective 3 cr Professional Elective
Elective 2 cr Professional Elective
Elective 3 cr OPEN Elective
Total 14 cr
Sixth Year, Second Semester
(Thesis Option)
ARCH 614 6 cr Arch Design Project II
Elective 3 cr Professional Elective
Elective 3 cr Professional Elective
Total 12 cr
(Studio Option)
Arch 611 5 cr Arch Design IV
Elective 1 cr Professional Elective
Elective 3 cr Professional Elective
Elective 3 cr Professional Elective
Total 12 cr
For information on course availability, check the UNL Class Schedule website.
MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE AWARDED AFTER SIXTH YEAR
Sixth Year Thesis Option (1)
Application Process
Final Project Schedule
Milestone Dates
Proposal Requirements
NAAB Requirements
Helpful Hints for Your Submission
Application Process (fifth
year spring semester)
Spring 2012
1. On or before Monday, January 23 of the Fifth Year Spring Semester, the student is expected to submit to the Architecture Program Office their initial project proposal. (500 - 700 words in an 8 1/2 by 11 format). The proposal should indicate the mentor who has agreed to work with you or a preferred list of two or three faculty members you would like to work with. It is the student’s responsibility to meet with potential faculty and get their agreement to serve as your mentor. The office will log in the proposals and distribute them to the appropriate faculty members. The faculty will take the next two weeks to review the proposal for compliance with the five points indicated in the submittal description attached to this document. Students who fail to meet this deadline will not be allowed to register for the design thesis studio. These students will have to reapply in the next cycle, the following year or register for option 2.
2. On or before Monday, March 19, students are asked to submit the name of the faculty member with whom they have reached a tentative agreement to mentor their project. Those students who have not been able to reach an agreement with a faculty member will be given a list of faculty names who have yet to reach agreement with two students. Only full time tenure track architecture program faculty are eligible to be mentors for the Terminal Project. Once again students are expected to approach and engage faculty members in discussions about their proposal in order to secure their agreement to serve as mentor.
3. On or before Monday, April 2, each student is required to submit to the Program Office an expanded proposal (1500-3000 words and 2-6 visual plates). This final proposal will be a part of your published document required for completion of the Terminal Project. This proposal must be certified (signed) by an appropriate faculty member who will serve as the mentor for the project. There must be a cover page with the title of the project, your name, date of submission and a space for the mentor to sign off on the proposal with his or her name listed below the space. Faculty mentors have the soul authority to determine if the proposal meets the spirit and intent of the basic objectives of the Terminal Project
4. Certified submissions will be recorded and the students will be given permission to register for the Final Project Studio. Students whose proposal is not certified will be required to reapply and resubmit a new proposal in the next cycle or register for the Option 2, Vertical Studio.
Final Project (Sixth Year)
Schedule
Fall 2012
1. Not later than the third week of the fall semester the students will submit, for their mentor's review and evaluation, a programmatic report that includes the structure of the project's development and ways to address criteria for evaluation.
(September 3 – September 7)
2. At the eighth week of the semester the student will, with the mentor's approval, schedule and make a public presentation to a review panel a programmatic and conceptual representation of their project.
(October 8 – October 12)
3. Somewhere within the 12th week the student and mentor will schedule an interim review of the student’s project. The faculty member will give the student a written or verbal evaluation of their progress relative to the expectations of the faculty for the Terminal Project.
(November 5 – November 9)
4. During Finals Week of the semester all students, with the mentor's approval, will pin-up and present the schematic design of their project in the designated space on Monday, December 10 by 9:00AM. Over the course of a two day schedule, full time architecture program faculty that are mentoring thesis students will hear presentations. Students must be present to answer questions. This review will lead to a binding up or down vote by the faculty. Students will be notified of the result of this vote by their mentors on December 12. Students judged unsatisfactory will not be able to continue into 614 and instead will be directed to one of the vertical studios for the spring semester.
5. Following a satisfactory evaluation by the faculty, the mentor and the student will determine the necessary requirements for the next phase of design development.
Spring 2013
6. Within the 4th or 5th week of the spring semester the student and mentor will schedule an interim review of the student’s project. The faculty member will give the student a written or verbal evaluation of their progress relative to the expectations of the faculty for the Terminal Project.
(January 28 – February 8)
7. In the 12th week of the semester on either Thursday or Friday of that week, the student, with the mentor's approval, will be scheduled to make a public presentation of the final design development of their project. A panel of two faculty chosen by the student from the tenure or tenure track faculty in Architecture along with their mentor and visiting critics will be convened to review the work and make a pass/fail recommendation to the student’s mentor. Students are encouraged to identify and secure agreement from the faculty members they wish to serve on their review panel as soon as possible. This selection should reflect the focus and expertise of the faculty relative to your project to ensure the most informed and productive conversation over the course of the year and in this review.
(March 25 – March 29)
8. Students whose work is judged to be acceptable by the faculty panel will be required to produce a book documenting their research, design process, and final product within the time frame designated by the faculty for publication. All books will be submitted by the student for inclusion in the Library archive. Students should meet with their mentor to discuss the content and organization of their book in the week following the review. Students who fail to meet the established schedule for publication will not be allowed to graduate in the spring or until such time as the final book is submitted to the Architecture Program.
Students whose work is judged to be inadequate by the review panel will be required to revise their project for presentation, with the approval of their mentor, during finals week. Should their project be judged once again to be inadequate by a second panel of faculty, the student will not be allowed to finish the Terminal Project and will be required to take one additional vertical studio to complete the studio requirement for the Master of Architecture degree. Those projects judged to be acceptable will be given the summer to complete their book to graduate at the end of the summer.
9. Two copies of the final work along with a cd containing this work must be delivered to the Program office on or before Thursday, April 18 by 12:00 noon. At this time the students will be directed to provide a check for the binding fee for their copy to Jay Penner in the Dean’s Office and a second check to the Bursar’s Office to pay binding fee for the library copy. After completing these two tasks the student is to return to the Program Office with the two receipts to confirm the transactions, completing this process.
10. All students who have successfully completed their project and book will be required to display an abbreviated presentation of their work within a designated space on Monday April 29th for review by the faculty to determine the Cunningham Medal short list. (students are expected to put up their work the afternoon of April 28th between 12:00 PM and 5:00PM, work not displayed in that time will be excluded from the medal judging) The finalists will be posted the afternoon of Monday, April 29th at 3:00. All students not selected will need to remove their work that afternoon to make way for the selected students to put up a complete display for review by the medal jury. The presentations to the Medal jury will take place Tuesday, April 30 between 9:00AM and 12:00PM and will be open to all students and faculty. All students will be responsible for remounting their abbreviated display on Wednesday May 3 between 12:00 PM and 4:00 PM for the graduation event that evening.
Milestone Dates
Spring 2012
Due date for initial submission to Program Office Jan. 23
Early report on mentor selection from student to Program Office Mar. 19
Due date for the final proposal between student and mentor to
Program Office Apr. 2
Fall
Initial Research/Program Draft Sep. 3 - 7
Program/Research Review Oct. 8 - 12
Interim Reviews Nov. 5 – 9
Schematic Design Review by Faculty Dec. 10 – 11
Review Results to Students Dec. 12
* Preliminary pending the publishing of the University calendar and any Faculty actions.
Spring
Interim Review Jan.28 – Feb. 8
Final Review by Faculty Mar. 25 – Mar. 29
Project Books Due 12:00PM Apr. 18
Display work for Cunningham Medal review exhibit Apr. 28
Faculty review for Cunningham Medal Jury Apr. 29
Finalist jury review Apr. 30
Resubmission reviews May 2
Graduation Exhibit May 3
* Preliminary pending the publishing of the University calendar any Faculty actions.
Mentored Project PPC Proposal
Requirements
Eligible Candidates
Students enrolled in the Architecture Program who have successfully accomplished all required prerequisites for the studio and have successfully completed the procedure outlined below will be allowed to register for the Final Project Studio.
Mentor Definition
Full time faculty members of the Architecture Program or, subject to the approval of the architecture faculty, other full time faculty members in the college can serve as mentors. Other faculty members or outside professionals with particular professional expertise in the area of the proposed student project are encouraged to participant, but can only serve as support to the architecture faculty mentor.
Proposal Requirements
The initial proposal should be structured as indicated below and respond to the following points:
1. Project Title
(The title should be relatively short and descriptive of the project to be pursued.)
2. Statement of Intent
Brief statement identifying issue(s) to be investigated and the relevant areas of expertise and interest offered by the faculty of the architectural professional program
(This portion of the text should begin to give some insight into the trajectories of research and investigation planned for the project, and as a result imply what expertise will be required to legitimately pursue.)
3. NAAB Performance Criteria
A commitment to meet the NAAB criteria identified by the faculty and those identified by you beyond those criteria alone with a brief narrative describing their relevance to the final project. (At the least all proposals must acknowledge a commitment to address these criterions with some indication of how you expect to do so. You are encouraged to include additional criterion if they are relevant to your proposal.)
4. Site Description
(Sites can be specific or be described as a series of criterion that describe the characteristics of the site as it relates to your project proposal. Sites described in grossly general terms i.e. ‘in Chicago’ are not acceptable.)
5. Methodology/Approach
An indication of the anticipated methods of analysis for the project, including potentially descriptive methods, normative methods, and/or critical methods.
(the desire here is to cite the process you plan to pursue in your final project)
Criteria for Proposal Evaluation
The following two criteria, in addition to compliance with the format indicated above, will be used to evaluate the project proposal:
1. The project must be designed and developed independently by an individual student.
2. The project must be of architectural significance and have as its intention the design of a built environment, representing an act or acts of human activity.
Criteria for Mentored Project Evaluation
1. The project should demonstrate a comprehensive, in-depth understanding of the theoretical and applied study processes learned throughout the course of the student's professional education.
2. The project should provide evidence, narrative and visual, of the student's realization of the initial design intentions, as identified in the initial project proposal, and the programmatic conclusions produced through the inquiry process.
3. The project should provide evidence of the student's ability to address and resolve issues related to architecture. For example issues surrounding space, place, tectonics, and construction at building and /or urban scales.
4. The project should provide evidence of the students’ ability to bring to bear both creative and critical thinking skills in the development of their design solution.
5. The project should demonstrate the student's ability to communicate the design intentions and designed results using clear and legible forms of architectural representation.
NAAB Criterion (minimum)
Arch 613
A-1. Communication Skills: Ability to read, write, listen, and speak effectively
A-2. Design Thinking Skills: Ability to raise clear and precise questions, use abstract ideas to interpret information, consider diverse points of view, reach well-reasoned conclusions, and test them against relevant criteria and standards
A-3. Visual Communication Skills: Ability to use appropriate representational media, including freehand drawing and computer technology, to convey essential formal elements at each stage of the programming and design process.
A-5. Investigative Skills: Ability to gather, assess, record, apply and comparatively evaluate relevant information in architectural coursework and design processes
A-6. Fundamental Design Skills: Ability to effectively use basic architectural and environmental principles in the design.
A-7. Use of Precedents: Ability to examine and comprehend the fundamental principles present in relevant precedents and to make choices regarding the incorporation of such principles into architectural and urban design projects
B-1. Pre-Design: Ability to prepare a comprehensive program for an architectural project, such as by providing an assessment of client and user needs, an inventory of space and equipment requirements, an analysis of site conditions, a review of the relevant laws and standards and assessment of their implications for the project, and a definition of site selection and design assessment criteria.
B-4. Site Design: Ability to respond to site characteristics, including proper contour manipulation in the development of a project design.
C-2. Human Behavior: Understanding of the relationship between human behavior, the natural environment and the design of the built environment.
Arch 614
A-1. Communication Skills: Ability to read, write, listen, and speak effectively
A-2. Design Thinking Skills: Ability to raise clear and precise questions, use abstract ideas to interpret information, consider diverse points of view, reach well-reasoned conclusions, and test them against relevant criteria and standards
A-3. Visual Communication Skills: Ability to use appropriate representational media, including freehand drawing and computer technology, to convey essential formal elements at each stage of the programming and design process.
A-5. Investigative Skills: Ability to gather, assess, record, apply and comparatively evaluate relevant information in architectural coursework and design processes
A-6. Fundamental Design Skills: Ability to effectively use basic architectural and environmental principles in the design.
A-7. Use of Precedents: Ability to examine and comprehend the fundamental principles present in relevant precedents and to make choices regarding the incorporation of such principles into architectural and urban design projects
A-8. Ordering Systems Skills: Understanding the fundamentals of both natural and formal ordering systems and the capacity of each to inform two- and three-dimensional design
B-1. Pre-Design: Ability to prepare a comprehensive program for an architectural project, such as by providing an assessment of client and user needs, an inventory of space and equipment requirements, an analysis of site conditions, a review of the relevant laws and standards and assessment of their implications for the project, and a definition of site selection and design assessment criteria.
B-2. Accessibility: Ability to design sites, facilities, and systems to provide independent and integrated use by individuals with mobility, sensory, physical and cognitive disabilities.
B-4. Site Design: Ability to respond to site characteristics, including proper contour manipulation in the development of a project design.
C-2. Human Behavior: Understanding of the relationship between human behavior, the natural environment and the design of the built environment.
C-9 Ethics and Professional Judgement: Understanding of the ethical issues involved in the formation of professional judgement regarding social, political and cultural issues in architectural design and practice
Important Reminders for your M.
Arch Terminal Project Proposal
Project Title:
Your title should clearly indicate the proposed project's focus.
Project Description:
This is a detailed description of the proposed project. It should include
information about the program, the proposed types and scales of planning/design
intervention, and the intended users.
*In other words, is this a library, a school, a house, or an urban design
project?
*How big is it? Are you proposing to prepare a master plan for a larger
area and proposing to design in detail a specific part of it?
*What uses do you seek to accommodate?
*Who are the users? Do they have specific demands or needs?
*If you are proposing a design-build project how are you planning to realize
it? Note that a design-build project is not a design-build project if it
is not built. It requires a significant degree of advance preparation and
familiarity with the processes that are outside your control (permits, manufacturing
etc.).Therefore the committee needs to see clear evidence of its feasibility
to approve it.
**Note also that you should not be revisiting a project you were assigned
in previous years. By definition, the M. Arch Terminal Project should be
a student-initiated project, not one previously defined by a former studio
instructor.
Site Description:
You may pursue one of the following options:
--At the point of submission the proposal the project the site is already
chosen. In that case, the proposal should contain information about the
site with a good verbal description supported with visuals. (maps indicating
the location within the larger context-depending on the location the immediate
neighborhood, city, etc.; photographic images etc.) In other words, the
characteristics of the site should be clear to a reader even if s/he may
have never been at this location. Your site description should also include
a convincing justification as to why the proposed project/program is appropriate
for this location. (eg. If you are proposing an international airport for
Kearney, NE, that will not work.)
--The site has not been selected, deciding on the site is part of the proposed
process. In that case, there should be a well specified list of criteria
for selecting a site, or a detailed description of the process that will
lead to an appropriate site for the proposed program. These criteria should
include physical attributes (size, shape of terrain/topography, orientation,
climate etc.) contextual attributes (location, accessibility, density of
its surroundings, population around the site etc.). The description of the
process for identifying the appropriate site should be clear and precise.
Vague statements such as "I will do library research to determine the site"
or "I will collect data to determine the site" are not acceptable. Your
proposal should specify exactly what kind of data you are going to use to
determine the site, where you are going to look for that information (which
libraries, databases, archives etc), and a sampling of the types of questions
you are planning to ask to make that decision.
NAAB Criteria
You already have been given a list of the NAAB Criteria that you are expected
to satisfy during the course of this undertaking. You might already want
to start thinking about how your project is going to satisfy these criteria.
Thus when submitting your proposal include a brief sentence or two describing
how each item will be met with your proposed project.
If you are planning to add to that list or take some items out, it is your
responsibility to make a convincing case for this modification. When making
your NAAB List, you might consider asking yourself the following questions
as a starting point:
Consider each criterion on NAAB's list carefully.
How are you going to are going to address it?
What aspects of your undertaking will address it?
What skills you have gained in your education are you going to tap into?
Prepare your list once you answer those questions. This is clearly a tentative
guideline that will get you started. As you venture into the project and
you work with your respective mentors, you will discover you might need
to add new ones and take out others, but this initial should provide a fairly
reliable reference for you and the mentor whose help you intend to enlist.
About Process
The specifics of how you are actually going to execute this project depend
on your agreement with your mentor. However, it would be helpful for the
mentors with whom you plan to work to see that you have a road map in mind,
a sequence of procedures you intend to complete, and a fairly good idea
of what it will take to complete to realize your goals.
Finding a mentor
This is a very important component of your process and you should start
looking for a faculty member who will share your interest and will work
with you in the realization of your project as soon as possible. Do not
leave this to the last minute. The earlier you make contact with your mentor
the better.
Guidelines for Submission
*Format, Grammar and Spelling: This is a serious document: consider it a
contract or a proposal letter to a potential client. Thus your proposal
should not be sloppy, looking like it was put together at the last minute.
Grammatic mistakes, spelling errors, bad formatting are not acceptable.
*Bibliography: This is clearly a preliminary document, it will change and
expand during the thesis year. However, it is important because reveals
a degree of commitment to the project, suggesting that you have made an
informed choice, having investigated some related issues. When listing your
sources make sure that you are using appropriate conventions.
*When generating this document or any other document for academic review
consider using The Chicago Manual of Style, Kate Turabian's A Manual for
Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations and Strunk and White's
The Elements of Style as handy references. Your ideas may be brilliant,
but a bad presentation can seriously undermine their strength.
London Students
London students tend to operate under different deadlines. Experience suggests
that getting approval prior to departure can relieve you of long-distance
anxieties and last minute scramblings for finding a mentor. If you would
like to submit your proposal for early review, then the Christmas Break
is a good time to get that worked out. An early deadline will be announced
at the beginning of the semester. Keep your eyes peeled for announcements.
Fifth/Sixth Year Vertical Studio Option (2)
Process
Milestone Dates
NAAB Criteria
Academic Year 2011 / 2012 Vertical Studio Options
Fall 2011 - China Study Abroad Studio (Only for students approved for China travel)
Fall 2011 - dead mall walking, Tom Laging
Fall 2011 - Passive Building-Active Architecture...goes vertical, Erhard Schuetz
Fall 2011 - Design Operations: Exploring the Void, Peter Hind
Fall 2011 - Rural Future: Enabling a Bold Rural Future for the Great Plains, Kim Wilson
Fall 2011 - Lincolnopolis, Alan Berger (Hyde Chair of Excellence)
Spring 2012 - London Study Abroad Studio, Jeffrey Day (Only for students approved for London travel)
Spring 2012 - Reasoning, Janghwan Cheon
Spring 2012 - Parametric Pragmatism, Steve Hardy
Spring 2012 - Architecture & Context, Nate Krug
Spring 2012 - Innovations in Cross Cultural Health Care Design, Wayne Drummond
1. On or before January 27, students not wishing to pursue option one for the sixth year should indicate this intention with the Program Office by filing the appropriate form stating this intention.
2. During the sixth week (Feb. 14-18), faculty members wishing to teach one of the vertical option studios will provide a proposal to the students eligible for these studios. The proposals will indicate the following:
- framework for exploration
- a bibliography/reading list if appropriate
- NAAB criterion addressed in the studio
- an indication of the expected outcome(s) of the studio.
Those eligible students will give their preference by indication their first, second, and third choice for each semester. Every student must indicate all three choices or they will not be given full preference consideration. Studios will be offered based on preference and demand with the goal of having studio populations of between 10 and 14 students. Studios that fill with first preference requests will be offered first with those having the highest composite rating offered second.
Faculty offering a studio that is oversubscribed to will make the final selection of the students for that studio. Fifth year students will be given preference for the London Studio and the Hyde Chair studios. All other studios selection will attempt to give students their highest preference.
3. On or before April 4, students will be required to submit their preferences for vertical studios. Failure to submit a preference could result in restriction from registration for studio in the fall semester. Students are encouraged to speak with the various faculty offering studios for greater insight into the content and direction of the proposal.
4. On or before April 25, students will be notified of the studio assignments for the following year. Students will be allowed to register for the assigned studio after assignments have been made. Waiting lists will be established for those students wishing consideration for a studio for which they were not assigned. Alternate assignments will occur during the week before classes should openings come available.
Milestone Dates
Spring 2012
Intent form due date Jan. 31
Option Studios released Feb. 13-17c
Student preferences due Apr. 4
Notification of studio assignment for 2002-03 Mar. 30
Fall 2012
Interim Review Dates per syllabus
Studio Reviews Friday Dead Week
Spring 2013
Interim Submission Dates per syllabus
Final Design Review Friday Dead Week
NAAB Criterion (minimum)
A-1. Communication Skills: Ability to read, write, listen, and speak effectively
A-2. Design Thinking Skills: Ability to raise clear and precise questions, use abstract ideas to interpret information, consider diverse points of view, reach well-reasoned conclusions, and test them against relevant criteria and standards
A-3. Visual Communication Skills: Ability to use appropriate representational media, including freehand drawing and computer technology, to convey essential formal elements at each stage of the programming and design process.
A-5. Investigative Skills: Ability to gather, assess, record, apply and comparatively evaluate relevant information in architectural coursework and design processes
A-6. Fundamental Design Skills: Ability to effectively use basic architectural and environmental principles in the design.
A-7. Use of Precedents: Ability to examine and comprehend the fundamental principles present in relevant precedents and to make choices regarding the incorporation of such principles into architectural and urban design projects
A-8. Ordering Systems Skills: Understanding the fundamentals of both natural and formal ordering systems and the capacity of each to inform two- and three-dimensional design
B-1. Pre-Design: Ability to prepare a comprehensive program for an architectural project, such as by providing an assessment of client and user needs, an inventory of space and equipment requirements, an analysis of site conditions, a review of the relevant laws and standards and assessment of their implications for the project, and a definition of site selection and design assessment criteria.
B-2. Accessibility: Ability to design sites, facilities, and systems to provide independent and integrated use by individuals with mobility, sensory, physical and cognitive disabilities.
B-4. Site Design: Ability to respond to site characteristics, including proper contour manipulation in the development of a project design.
B-6 Comprehensive Design: Ability to understand, and to produce a comprehensive architectural project that integrates the following SPC A-2, 3, 4,5 & 8 and B-1, 2, 3, 4. 5, 7, 8, & 9
B-11 Building Service Systems Integration: Understanding of the basic principles and appropriate application and performance of building service systems such as plumbing, electrical, vertical transportation, security, and fire protection systems
C-2. Human Behavior: Understanding of the relationship between human behavior, the natural environment and the design of the built environment.
C-9 Ethics and Professional Judgment: Understanding of the ethical issues involved in the formation of professional judgment regarding social, political and cultural issues in architectural design and practice
Fall Studio Options
China Study Abroad Studio, Students must be approved for China Travel Aboard
(Fall 2011)
studio topic: Please contact Mark Hoistad for details at mhoistad1@unl.edu
dead mall walking, Tom Laging
(Fall 2011)
studio topic: PDF
Passive Building-Active Architecture...goes vertical, Erhard Schuetz (Fall
2011)
studio topic: PDF
Design Operations: Exploring the Void, Peter Hind
(Fall 2011)
Studio topic: PDF
Rural Future: Enabling a Bold Rural Future for the Great Plains, Kim Wilson (Fall
2011)
Studio topic: PDF
Lincolnopolis, Alan Berger (Hyde Chair of Excellence) (Fall
2011)
Studio topic: PDF
London Study Abroad Studio, Jeff Day (Spring 2012)
Studio topic: Travel Abroad Application Required
Reasoning, Janghwan Cheon
(Spring 2012)
Studio topic: PDF
Parametric Pragmatism, Steve(n) Hardy (Spring 2012)
Studio topic: PDF
Architecture & Context, Nate Krug (Spring 2012)
Studio topic: PDF
Innovations in Cross Cultural Health Care Design, Wayne Drummond
(Spring 2012)
Studio topic: PDF
